talbot wrote:

I would rather suffer through Matt Moore playing poorly than throw clausen in there to early and not give him time to sit an watch with the way the rest of the team is playing

I hear and tend to agree with you on this...but given these dynamic's, how poorly the OL pass pro has been and other team struggles coupled with Fox's histroy of favoring vet guys such as MM...Man MM must be playing even worse than the clubs OL...Fox maut think JC will be abe to deliver in the areas MM has apprently just stunk at...We donot get the advantage of seeing the whole field like they do with films...I have a feeling that MM is totally misreading coverages and holding onto the ball to long to often????

McGribble wrote:

I find it interesting how so many people are saying benching Moore is not the answer but man I heard the boos in San Francisco when he was not playing well. It just goes to show you, the grass is always greener...

thats right McG...they were even louder when they went over my head here in N...wow...they carried all the way to SF...LOL!
Think the passing game prob's are multiple...not just a QB issue, but I will give it to Fox in trying to light a spark...best work or My God it is going to be a looooong season!

cornhuskercatfan wrote:

Still say that the club must establish their identity as a top 5 rushing attack....currently they are ranked 16th in rushing at 104 yds per game and 27th in passing at 153.5 yds per game

If the running game can roll at 140-150 yds per game...IMO...no matter who the QB is 2 or 3...the passing numbers will improve!

I agree cornhusker...but we didn't look dominating in the run like usual.  Maybe we are missing Jeff O.   Maybe our OC/OL stink.   I am not sure.  But, our passing game is dismal.   I too hope that we can ignite a spark with Clausen.  I have a hard time believing that MM is this bad...seems like too many other problems to fix them all with just a QB move.